The Impact of Collaborative Concept Mapping On Studentsâ€™ Conceptual Understanding In Social Science
Aims: The present research paper aims at exploring the impact of collaborative concept mapping (CCM) on studentsâ€™ conceptual understanding in social science with the help of the collaborative concept mapping. Novak and Gowin (1984) defined concept map as a schematic device for representing a set of concept meanings embedded in a framework of propositions. When the concept maps are made with the collaboration of peers or teacher it is called collaborative concept mapping.
Method: In this study the students of class IX were tested with an achievement test based on their conceptual understanding in the selected topics of social science, and then they were given some focus questions to make collaborative concept maps in groups. The groups made were based on the achievement levels of the students i.e. high achievers, medium achievers, low achievers and mixed groups. They were tested again after collaborative concept mapping with the achievement test and their scores of post test were compared with pre test scores using t test.
Findings: The study indicated a significant impact of CCM on studentsâ€™ understanding of concepts. It was also found that middle group achieved the most through the CCM activity. Furthermore it was found that lower group were least affected by the collaborative concept mapping, however there was also positive impact of CCM on them.
â€¢ Best, J.W. & Kahn, J.V. (2008). Research in Education (10th ed.), New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley India Pvt. Ltd.
â€¢ CaÃ±as, A. J., Novak, J. D. (2008),The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools
â€¢ IHMC CmapTools (2004). The Website of CmapTools. http://cmap.ihmc.us.
â€¢ Novak J. D., Gowin D. B. (1984). learning how to learn.New York, NY: cambridge university press.
â€¢ Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative
construction of knowledge: A microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 305, 503-554.
â€¢ Roth, W.M., Roychoudhury, A. (1994),Science discourse through collaborative concept
mapping: new perspectives for the teacher , International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 16, Issue 4, 437 â€“ 455.
â€¢ Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative
representations: An empirical comparaison of three alternatives. In P. Dillenbourg, K. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning, Proceeding of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 577-584). Maastrict: Universiteit Maastricht.
â€¢ Vanides J., Yin Y., Tomita M., and Primo M. A. R., (2004) Using concept mapping in the
classroom, science scope. Vol. 28, No. 8
(Available at: http://works.bepress.com/maria_ruizprimo/ 28/)
â€¢ Woolfolk, A. (2004). educational psychology. ohio: pearson education Pvt. Ltd.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Innovative Knowledge Concepts are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.