Monitorial System: was it really an Indian idea?

  • Sarabjeet Kaur Research Scholar Zakir Husain Centre of Educational Studies School of Social Sciences Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi-110067

Abstract

The article traces the journey of the origin and development of the monitorial system.  It was also known as the Bell-Lancaster method on the name of its two popularizers.  The trajectory of the Monitorial System is quite interesting. As claimed by Andrew Bell this system was practiced in India and had its roots of origin in Madras hence its name the Madras School. But when we delve deeper we get acquainted with certain astonishing facts that it was never the case in India because there is no authenticity to this that it was being followed here and it was only later after Bell propounded this system that it became to be followed in. Though it became quite popular in the nineteenth century in England and Europe yet it proved to be an inefficient and incompetent way of providing substitutes for teachers. A fellow student helping another class mate can never be a teacher but only a help. Moreover, without being equipped with the training to teach how can a student enjoy the status of being a teacher? Furthermore it explores the causes that lead to its gradual decline inspite of it scaling the heights of glory. Its practice (if any) in India is also looked into. This article substantiates the fact that a pupil-teacher can never be a master but can only be an imperfect substitute for them.       

References

1. Sengupta, Parna. Pedagogy for Religion . New Delhi: Orient Black Swan, 2012.

2. Hager, Phil E. “Nineteenth Century Experiments with Monitorial Teaching.” The Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 40, No. 4, Africa: Its Educational Problems and Promises (Jan., 1959): 164-167.

3. Rayman, Ronald. “Joseph Lancaster’s Monitorial System of Instruction and American Indian Education, 1815-1838.” History of Education Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 4 (Winter, 1981): 395-409.
4. Rich, R. W. The Training of Teachers in England and Wales during the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: The University Press, 1933.
5. Jeffreys, M. V. C. Revolution in Teacher-Training. London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd., 1961.
6. D’ Souza, Austin and J. N. Chatterjee,. Training For Teachers in India and England Calcutta: Orient Longmans, 1956.
7. Cruickshank, Marjorie. “David Stow, Scottish Pioneer of Teacher Training in Britain.” British Journal of Educational Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2 (May, 1966): 205-215.

8. Bell, Andrew. An Analysis of the Experiment in Education, made at Egmore, near Madras, Third Edition, (Printed by T. Bensley, Bolt Court, Flest Street, for Cadell and Davies in the Strand, 1807).

9. Singh, Brij Raj. The First Protestant Missionary to India, Bartholomaeus Ziegenbalg (1683-1719). New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999.

10. Blackburn, Stuart. Print, Folklore and Nationalism in Colonial South India, n. p.: Permanent Black, 2003.

11. Raman, Bhavani. Document Raj, Writing and Scribes in Early Colonial South India. Ranikhet: Permanent Black, 2012.

12. Anathnath Basu (edited), Reports on the State of Education in Bengal (1835 & 1838). William Adam, (Calcutta: the Calcutta University Press, 48, Hazra Road, Ballygunge, 1941)
13. Parulekar, R. V. Survey of Indigenous Education in the Province of Bombay (1820-1830), Bombay: India Printing Works, 9 Bakehouse Lane, Fort, 1945, (Reprinted 1951).
14. Laird, M.A. Missionaries and Education in Bengal-1793-1837. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Published
2019-07-27
Section
Articles