The Relationships between Creative Self-Efficacy, Intrinsic Motivation and Creative Performance
The objectives of this conceptual paper are: to propose and argue a) the direct relationship between creative self-efficacy (CSE) and creative performance; and b) the mediating role of intrinsic motivation between CSE and creative performance. Drawing upon self-efficacy theory, Herzberg’s two-factor theory and componential theory of creativity, two propositions are suggested. It is proposed that there will be a positive relationship between CSE and creative performance. In addition, the authors also make the case that intrinsic motivation will mediate the relationship between CSE and creative performance. The paper consolidates self-efficacy theory, Herzberg’s two-factor theory and componential theory of creativity to provide a conceptual framework for subjectively measuring creative performance. This paper extends our knowledge regarding the pertinent role of CSE as an exogenous latent construct in stimulating the divergent thinking process of employees in workplace. The proposed framework may be applied in various social contexts such as healthcare, education, creative advertising, research and development, hospitality and new business incubation.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1998). How to kill creativity?. Harvard Business Review, 76(5), 76-87.
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. (1994). The work preference inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950-967.
Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2008). Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In J. Zhou, & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 33-64). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, Vol. 4 (pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457.
Berg, S. T. S., Grimstad, A., Škerlavaj, M., & Černe, M. (2017). Social and economic leader-member exchange and employee creative behavior: The role of employee willingness to take risks and emotional carrying capacity. European Management Journal, 35(5), 676-687.
Cai, W., Lysova, E. I., Bossink, B. A., Khapova, S. N., & Wang, W. (2018). Psychological capital and self‐reported employee creativity: The moderating role of supervisor support and job characteristics. Creativity and Innovation Management (forthcoming). doi.10.1111/caim.12277
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260.
Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. (2007). The influence of leaders' and other referents' normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(1), 35-48.
Carr, A. (2010). The most important leadership quality for CEOs? Creativity. Fastcompany.com. Retrieved from https://www.champlain.edu/Documents/core_division/fastcompany_5_10.pdf
Chuang, C.-F., Shiu, S.-C., & Cheng, C.-J. (2010). The relation of college students’ process of study and creativity: The mediating effect of creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 4(7), 1780-1783.
CPI (2014). Creative productivity index: Analysing Creativity and Innovation in Asia. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/creative-productivity-index-analysing-creativity-and-innovation-asia
Fareed, K., & Jan, F. A. (2016). Cross-cultural validation test of Herzberg's two factor theory: An analysis of bank officers working in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 10(2), 285-300.
GCR (2017). Global competitiveness report (2016-2017). Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2016-2017-1
Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
Graham, J. D. B. (2011). Elements of human effectiveness: Intelligences, traits, and abilities that lead to success and fulfillment in life (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 3477827. https://pqdtopen.proquest.com/doc/901462702.html?FMT=ABS
Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 1-16.
Hannam, K., & Narayan, A. (2015). Intrinsic motivation, organizational justice, and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 214-224.
Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Herzberg, F. (2003). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 81(1), 87-96.
Hur, W. M., Moon, T., & Jun, J. K. (2016). The effect of workplace incivility on service employee creativity: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(3), 302-315.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 247-258.
Jiang, W., & Gu, Q. (2017). Leader creativity expectations motivate employee creativity: a moderated mediation examination. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 724-749.
Karwowski, M. (2011). It does not hurt to ask… But sometimes it hurts to believe: Polish students’ creative self-efficacy and its predictors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 154-164.
Karwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8(4), 547-558.
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 62-70.
Khattak, S. R., Batool, S., & Haider, M. (2017). Relationship of leadership styles and employee creativity: A mediating role of creative self-efficacy and moderating role of organizational climate. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11(2), 698-719.
Liao, H., Liu, D., & Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090-1109.
Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236-263.
Malik, M. A. R., Butt, A. N., & Choi, J. N. (2015). Rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of creative self‐efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 59-74.
Muñoz-Pascual, L., & Galende, J. (2017). The impact of knowledge and motivation management on creativity: Employees of innovative Spanish companies. Employee Relations, 39(5), 732-752.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). A comparison of self-ratings and non self-report measures of employee creativity. Human Relations, 65, 1021-1047.
Puente-Díaz, R. (2016). Creative self-efficacy: An exploration of its antecedents, consequences, and applied implications. The Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 175-195.
Richter, A. W., Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282-1290.
Schoen, J. L. (2015). Effects of implicit achievement motivation, expected evaluations, and domain knowledge on creative performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(3), 319-338.
Schwarzer, R. A. (1999). General perceived self-efficacy in 14 cultures. Retrieved from http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/world14.htm
Shalley, C. E., Gilson, L. L., & Blum, T. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 489-505.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1709-1721.
Simmons, A. L., Payne, S. C., & Pariyothorn, M. M. (2014). The role of means efficacy when predicting creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 53-61.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137-1148.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2004). The Pygmalion process and employee creativity. Journal of Management, 30, 413-432.
West, M., & Farr, F. (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Innovative Knowledge Concepts are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.