An investigation on the interrelation between teachers' viewpoint on mathematics and learners' mathematics accomplishment in high and higher secondary schools in hilly district of Assam.

  • Ashim Bora Associate Professor & HoD, Department of Mathematics, Diphu Government College, Assam-782452, India.
  • S. Ahmed 2Professor & Head, Mathematics Department, Rajiv Gandhi University, Rono Hills, Itangar, Arunachal Pradesh-791112, India
Keywords: Teachers’ View, Students’ View, Achievement in Mathematics, High Schools.


The present examination focuses on the connection between educators' disposition and learner' mathematics accomplishment is high schools of hilly area of Assam. We are adopting descriptive survey design in the study. A sum of 1240 students of 48 high schools situated in a tribal people dominated hilly district of Assam is selected for the study. Forty eight (48) mathematics teachers are interviewed from the respective schools. Two research instruments (questionnaires) are employed for data gathering. The collected data are analysed using simple frequency and percentage method. The consequences of the investigation uncovered that there is a solid positive connection between teachers' attitude regarding mathematics teaching and the scholarly accomplishment of the pupils in mathematics.


1) Aiken, L. R (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46(2), 293-311.
2) Ahmed, Sahin and Bora, Ashim. ( 2011). Gender Differences and Achievements in Mathematics among the Students in High School Examination in Diphu Town of Karbi Anglong District of Assam, India. International Journal of Mathematical Education, 1(1), 57-62.
3) Anastasi, C. (1957). Attitude of in-service and pre-service primary school teachers Journal of Education Psychology, 36(3), 3, 1-5.
4) Bandura A.(Ed.). (1971). Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories, Chicago Aldine-Atherton
5) Bhatia, K.L. & B. D. Bhatia. (1988). Principles and Methods o f Teaching. POAB House Publishers. New Delhi. India.
6) Cohrssen, C., Church, A., Ishimine, K. & Tayler, C. (2013). Playing with maths: Facilitating the learning in play-based learning, Australasian Journal Of Early Childhood, 38 (1), 95 – 99.
7) Daskalogianni, K. & Simpson, A. (2000). Towards a definition of attitude: the relationship between the affective and the cognitive in pre-university students. Proceedings of PME 24, Hiroshima, Japan, 2, 217-224,.
8) Dodeen, H. A., Ibrahim, A. A. & Emad, M. (2003). Attitude of pre service Teachers towards persons with disabilities: Predictions for the success of inclusion. College Student Journal, 37(4), 515 -521.
9) Evans, B. (2011). Secondary Mathematics Teacher Differences: Teacher Quality and Preparation in a New York City Alternative Certification Program. The Mathematics Educator, 20(2), 24–32.
10) Ernest, P. (1989). The Impact of Beliefs on the Teaching of Mathematics. In Ernest, P. (Ed.), Mathematics Teaching: The State of the Art. New York: Falmer. 249–253.
11) Flores, M. A. (2001). Person and Context in Becoming a New Teacher. Journal of Education for Teaching, 27(2), 135-148.
12) Haladyna, T., Shaughnessy, J., & Shaughnessy, M. (1983). A Causal Analysis of Attitude toward Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 19–29.
13) Hussian, S., Ali, R., Ramzan, M., & Qadeer, M.Z. (2011). Attitude of secondary school teachers towards teaching profession. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(1), 985-990.
14) Jacobs, G. J. and Spangenberg, E. (2014). Mathematics Teachers’ Attitudes towards the Subject: The Influence of Gender, Age and Teaching Experience. Proceeding of International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 19 – 23 OCTOBER 2014, Held at the Mopani Camp in Kruger National Park, Limpopo, South Africa, 91-100.
15) Jahoda, G. (1973). Psychology and the developing countries: Do they need each other? International Social Science Journal, 25 (4), 461-474.
16) Kalder, R. and Lesik, S. (2011). A classification of attitudes and beliefs towards mathematics for secondary mathematics pre-service teachers and elementary pre-service teachers: An exploratory study using latent class analysis. IUMPST: The Journal, 5, 1-21. Retrieved October 01, 2018, from
17) Kelchtermans, G & Ballet, K. (2002). Micropolitical literacy: reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development. International Journal of Educational Research, 37 (8), 755–767.
18) McLeod, D. (1992). Research on Affect in Mathematics Education: A Re-conceptualization. In Grows, D. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. New York: McMillan Publishing Company. 575-596.
19) Nisbet, S. (1991). A New Instrument to Measure Pre-service Primary Teachers' Attitudes to Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 34-56.
20) Phillips, R. B. (1973). Teacher Attitude as Related to Student Attitude and Achievement in Elementary School Mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 73(6), 501-507.
21) Ponte, J. P., Matos, J.F. & Guimarães, H.M. (1994). Teachers' and students' views and attitudes towards a new mathematics curriculum: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(4), 347-365.
22) Quinn, R. J. (1998). Effects of Mathematics methods courses on the mathematical attitudes and content knowledge of pre-service teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 91 (2), 108-113.
23) Rao, V.K., & Reddy, R. S, (Eds.). (1992). Effective teachers and teaching. New Delhi: Common wealth Publishers.
24) Relich, J., Conroy, J., & Webber, V. (1991). Gender differences in self-concept: Male and female mathematics teachers as role models. Sydney, NSW: Department of School Education.
25) Relich, J., Way, J. & Martin, A. (1994). Attitudes to Teaching Mathematics: Further Development of a Measurement Instrument. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 56-69.
26) Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
27) Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Merrill.
28) Smith, N. A. (1990). Educational psychology: A Development Approach (5th Ed.) New York: McGraw Hill.
29) Smith, D. M. (1993). Pre Service Elementary teachers’ Attitude towards Mathematics and Teaching of Mathematics in Constructivist Classrooms. Phd Thesis, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma. ( As cited in Hussian, Ali, Ramzan & Qadeer, 2011)
30) Susana, B & Marcos, F. Elia. (1997). Physics Teachers’ Attitudes: How do they effect the reality of the classroom and models for change.Teachers’ attitude and Practices. In Tiberghien, A., Jossem, E. L. & Barojas, J (Eds), Connecting Research in Physics Education with Teacher Education. International Commission on Physics Education.
31) Tapia,M. (2004). An Instrument to Measure Mathematics Attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarter, 8(2), 16-21.
32) Taylor, L. (1992). Mathematical attitude development from a Vygotskian perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4(3), 8-23.
33) Trice, A. D., & Ogden, E. D. (1986). Correlates of mathematics anxiety in first-year elementary school teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 11(3), 2–4.
34) White, A. L., Way, J., Perry, B and Southwell, B. (2005/2006). Mathematical Attitudes, Beliefs and Achievement in Primary Pre-service Mathematics Teacher Education. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development , 7, 33–52
35) Williams, W. V. (1988). Answers to questions aboutanxiety. School Science and Mathematics, 88,95-105.
36) Wright, T. (1987). Instructional Task and Discoursal Outcome in the L2 Classroom. In Candlin, C. N. & Murphy, D. F. (Eds), Language Learning Tasks London: Prentice Hall, 47-48.
37) Olatunde, Y, P (2009). Relationship between Teachers’ Attitudes and Students’ Academic Achievement in Mathematics in Nigeria. European Journal of Social Science, 11(3), 364- 369..