Plagiarism: Detection Techniques and Tools.

  • Proloyendu Bhoumick Ph.D scholar, Department of Education, Rabindra Bharati University.Kolkata.
Keywords: Plagiarism, Intrinsic Plagiarism Detection, Extrinsic Plagiarism Detection, Monolingual detection, Cross lingual detection.

Abstract

Plagiarism is an act or practice of taking someone’s words, ideas or concept in one’s own creation without giving credit to the creator. This practice has been carried out since a long time in academia, music, film, painting, sculpture, and dance; to some extent in every dimensions of creative world. But particularly in academia, this practice has been widely spread over last several decades. Different effort has been taken to counter it. Detection of plagiarize text document with high accuracy is a challenging task. Several methods or techniques are used by plagiarism detecting tools or software. A basic mechanism of textual plagiarism detection is based on matching or comparing the input text to the Reference text with Monolingual or Cross lingual detection. Plagiarize segment with references is provided as output of the process. Analyzing the writing style of the author in different part of a particular document, is the another technique used by plagiarism detecting tools or software. The present paper throws some light on the different types of plagiarism in academia and the corresponding technique to detect that. Last part of this paper states some available detection tools and software used by the different stakeholders in the academia.

References

1. Barron-Cedeno, A and Rosso, P (2009).On automatic plagiarism detection based on n-grams comparison, in: European Conference on Information Retrieval, Springer, pp. 696-700.
2. Bazdaric K. (2012).Plagiarism detection: quality management tool for all scientific journals. Croat Med Journal.
3. Bin-Habtoor,A and Zaher,M(2012) . A survey on plagiarism detection systems, International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering 4 (2).
4. Chow,T.W and Rahman, M(2009).Multilayer som with tree-structured data for efficient document retrieval and plagiarism detection, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 20 (9) 1385-1402.
5. Delors, J., & UNESCO. (1996). Learning, the treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO Publication.
6. Ochroch,E.A( 2011). Review of plagiarism detection freeware, Anesthesia & Analgesia 112 (3) :742--743.
7. White,D.R and Joy,M.S(2004). Sentence-based natural language plagiarism detection, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC) 4 (4).
8. Yang, C.C.; Chen, Hsinchun and Honga, Kay (2003). "Visualization of large category map for Internet browsing" . Decision Support Systems. 35 (1): 89–102.
9. http://www.duplichecker.com/, Duplichecker
10. http://www.ithenticate.com/, ithenticate.
11. http://plagiarisma.net/, Plagiarisma.
12. http://www.plagium.com/en/plagiarismchecker, Plagiarismchecker.
13. http://www.plagtracker.com/, Plagtracker
14. http://www.plagscan.com/, Plagsca
15. https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/8864815_UGC-Public-Notice-on-Draft-UGC-Regulations,-2017.pdf
Published
2018-08-22
Section
Articles