Global ethics to Environmental Ethics: A Philosophical Reflection
AbstractThe main strategy of this paper is to explain and exemplify a philosophical and ethical transition from global ethics to environmental ethics. Traditional ethical systems, such as, deontological ethics, consequential ethics, are called global ethics because the moral implication of such theories are universalizable in nature. Kantian deontology does not accept any moral dilemma and moral exception from theoretical perspective. Even consequential ethical approach attempts to maximize the consequence of the moral action with the background of the moral principle ‘greatest good of the greatest numbers’. Environmental ethics talks in favor of the whole ecosystem. It incorporates both biotic as well as a biotic community within moral and ethical realm. It states that both biotic and a biotic communities have equal intrinsic or inherent value, not as a means to an end, but as an end in itself. This paper explores various aspects of ethical transformation from global to environmental.
Attfield, Robin, The Ethics of the Global Environment, Edinburgh University Press, 1999, p. 33.
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, translated and analyzed by H. J. Paton, Harper & Row, Publishers, 1964, p.19.
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, London, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Barry, Brian, The Liberal Theory of Justice : A Critical Examination of the Principle Doctrines in A Theory of Justice by John Rawls, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
See Goodpaster, Kenneth, ‘On Being Morally Considerable’, Journal of Philosophy, 75, 1978, 308-25.
Paul, m. w., ‘Biodiversity as a Source of Biological Resources: A Mew Look at Biodiversity Values’, Environmental Values, 6.3, 1997, pp.251-68
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Copyrights for articles published in International Journal of Innovative Knowledge Concepts are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author.