Influence of native language on non-native language’s vowel duration: A Study of Nepali and Hindi speakers’ vowel duration

  • BRAJESH PRIYADARSHI ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF SPEECH AND HEARING, MYSORE
  • Anup Ghimire Reader in Linguistics, Department of Speech Language Pathology, AIISH, Mysore
Keywords: Hindi vowel, Nepali vowel, Vowel duration, Vowel acoustics

Abstract

This paper attempts to study the variation in vowel duration for native and non-native Hindi speakers and also, the influence of native Nepali language on non-native Hindi language vowel duration. The acoustic characteristics of vowel duration in Hindi words spoken by native and non-native speakers of Hindi have been compared, by segmenting the words into syllables and phonemes. The vowels /ə/, /a/, / ɪ /, / i/, /ʊ/, /u/, /e/, /ɛ/, /o/ found predominantly in Hindi, were directed for analysis. The two groups of participants, twelve in each group were involved in the study. Results indicated that variation in vowel duration for six of the vowels were quite evident in the case of native Hindi speakers as compared with the non-native Hindi speakers (native Nepali speakers); but vowels /ə/, / ɪ / and /ʊ/ did not show any significant difference in both groups. It was evidenced that Hindi is stress based and in Nepali language, both long and short vowels were pronounced predominantly as short; leading to an inference that the native Nepali speakers tend to reduce the vowel duration while speaking Hindi words.

References

Acharya, J. (1991). A descriptive grammar of Nepali and an analyzed corpus. Georgetown University Press.
Belasco, S. (1953). The influence of force of articulation of consonants on vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(5), 1015–1016.
Chen, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22(3), 129–159.
Ciszewski, T. (2012). Stressed vowel duration and phonemic length contrast. Research in Language, 10(2), 215–223.
De Jong, K. (2004). Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics, 32(4), 493–516.
Fry, D. B. (1979). The physics of speech. Cambridge University Press.
House, A. S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(1), 105–113.
Jain, D., & Cardona, G. (2007). The Indo-Aryan Languages. Routledge.
Masica, C. P. (1993). The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge University Press.
Mishra, D., & Bali, K. (2011). A comparative phonological study of the dialects of Hindi. Proceedings of ICPhS XVII, Hong Kong, 17–21.
Morton, J., & Jassem, W. (1965). Acoustic correlates of stress. Language and Speech, 8(3), 159–181.
Ohala, M. (1999). 5 The syllable in Hindi Manjari Ohala. The Syllable: Views and Facts, 45, 93.
Pandey, P. (2007). Phonology–orthography interface in Devanāgarī for Hindi. Written Language & Literacy, 10(2), 139–156.
Perwitasari, A., Klamer, M., Witteman, J., & Schiller, N. O. (2015). Vowel duration in English as a second language among Javanese learners. In International Conference on Phonetic Sciences.
Porzuczek, A. (2012). Measuring vowel duration variability in native English speakers and polish learners. Research in Language, 10(2), 201–214.
Rahman, A. R. M. M. (2017). Tense-lax merger: Bangla as a first language speakers’ pronunciation of English monophthongs. Asian Englishes, 1–22.
Rajashekhar, B. (2013). Vowel Duration across Age and Dialects of Telugu Language. Language in India, 13(2).
Ravisankar, G. (1994). Intonation patterns in Tamil (Vol. 5). Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.
Savithri, S. R. (1986). Durational analysis of Kannada vowels. Journal of Acoustical Society of India, 14(2), 31–34.
Yadav, R. (1980). The influence of aspiration on vowel duration in Maithili. Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 7, 1–2.
Published
2018-07-29
Section
Articles